DEX ONE Corp DEXO (last ticker on record)
CIK 30419Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Mar 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Feb 2010 to Oct 2011
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Smith AndersonFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Wildman Harrold Allen & DixonFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 2.20×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2013 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Smith Anderson | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 67 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Jones Day | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Davis Polk | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Wildman Harrold Allen & Dixon | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 17 | 0.59 | 1.31 | 2.20 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Fried Frank | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Larry A. BardenSidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- Amy M. BattenSmith AndersonFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.22×
- Gerald F. RoachSmith AndersonFirst linked Jun 2008 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- Kenneth B. WallachSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Robert P. BellFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.13×
- Thomas C. DanielsJones DayFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.34×
- Joel S. HoffmanSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 1996 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.87×
- David N. ShineFried FrankFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Kimberly J. PustulkaCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larry A. BardenSidley Austin | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.67 |
| Amy M. BattenSmith Anderson | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 3.22 |
| Gerald F. RoachSmith Anderson | Jun 2008 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| Kenneth B. WallachSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Robert P. Bell | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 2.13 |
| Thomas C. DanielsJones Day | Jun 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 2.34 |
| Joel S. HoffmanSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 1996 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 1.87 |
| David N. ShineFried Frank | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 9 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Kimberly J. PustulkaCravath Swaine & Moore | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 16 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.25 |