LASERCARD CORP LCRD (last ticker on record)
CIK 30140Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edwards Angell Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 517 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 76 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 1.36 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Feb 2009 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.06 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jan 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 517 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.24 |
| Shaw Pittman | May 2006 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.04 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew J. GardellaMintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and PopeoFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Timothy R. CurryO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Stephen M. WurzburgPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew J. GardellaMintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Timothy R. CurryO Melveny & Myers LLP | Feb 2009 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.56 | 1.34 | 0.59 |
| Stephen M. WurzburgPillsbury Winthrop | Jan 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.11 |