OMNICOM GROUP INC. OMC (last ticker on record)
CIK 29989Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jan 2025 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Jones DayFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Jan 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Donovan Leisure Newton & IrvineFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Davis & GilbertFirst linked Feb 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2025 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willkie Farr | Jan 2025 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Jones Day | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Dewey Ballantine | Jan 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.87 |
| Donovan Leisure Newton & Irvine | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Davis & Gilbert | Feb 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.52 | 0.58 | 1.52 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jan 2025 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bradley C. FarisLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.24×
- Jason MorelliLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.87×
- Rory T. HoodKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert A. ProfusekJones DayFirst linked Oct 2015 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Joel H. TrotterLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Lisa K. KunkleFirst linked Aug 2003 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Lyle G. GanskeJones DayFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Christopher M. KellyJones DayFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Linda E. RansomDewey BallantineFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bradley C. FarisLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.24 |
| Jason MorelliLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.87 |
| Rory T. HoodKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2017 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert A. ProfusekJones Day | Oct 2015 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Joel H. TrotterLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Lisa K. Kunkle | Aug 2003 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Lyle G. GanskeJones Day | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.81 | 1.26 | 0.79 |
| Christopher M. KellyJones Day | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 56 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Linda E. RansomDewey Ballantine | Dec 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 3.42 | 0.00 | 1.79 |