CONSTAR INTERNATIONAL INC CNRN (last ticker on record)
CIK 29806Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Jan 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2007 to Jan 2009
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Miller & MartinFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepper Hamilton | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Dechert LLP | Nov 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Miller & Martin | May 2005 | Text search only | 49 | 0.33 | 1.26 | 0.74 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Eric S. SiegelDechert LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David LopezCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- WILLIAM G. LAWLORDechert LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.25×
- Michael A. BeckerCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.16×
- William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric S. SiegelDechert LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David LopezCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| WILLIAM G. LAWLORDechert LLP | May 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 2.25 |
| Michael A. BeckerCahill Gordon & Reindel | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 11 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 3.16 |
| William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & Reindel | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 1.15 |