COMERICA INC CMA (last ticker on record)
CIK 28412Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Oct 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Bodman LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Locke LordFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haynes and Boone | Oct 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Mayer Brown | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Bodman LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Locke Lord | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mitchell S. EitelSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2026 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Nicholas G. DemmoWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Edward S. BestMayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- STANLEY F. FARRARSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Richard R. OroscoFirst linked Feb 1996 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitchell S. EitelSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2026 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Nicholas G. DemmoWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| Edward S. BestMayer Brown | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| STANLEY F. FARRARSullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Richard R. Orosco | Feb 1996 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.43 |