DELUXE CORP DLX (last ticker on record)
CIK 27996Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPFirst linked Apr 2025 · Named in a filing · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.14×
- Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Named in a filing · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked May 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2011 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troutman Pepper Locke LLP | Apr 2025 | Named in a filing | 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 |
| Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | May 2022 | Named in a filing | 154 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Feb 2018 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | May 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| DLA Piper | Nov 2011 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven KhadaviDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jonathan B. AbramDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 2.43×
- Robert A. RosenbaumDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven KhadaviDorsey & Whitney LLP | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.74 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jonathan B. AbramDorsey & Whitney LLP | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.42 | 1.22 | 2.43 |
| Robert A. RosenbaumDorsey & Whitney LLP | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.51 |