OMNIQ Corp. OMQS (last ticker on record)
CIK 278165Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2021 to May 2025
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jul 2019 · Named in a filing · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PCFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in a filing · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Stoecklein Law GroupFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jul 2019 | Named in a filing | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC | Sep 2016 | Named in a filing | 149 | 0.72 | 1.18 | 1.15 |
| Stoecklein Law Group | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.88 | 1.32 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arthur S. MarcusSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jul 2019 · Named in a filing · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Tonya Mitchem GrindonBaker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PCFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.54× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Donald J. StoeckleinStoecklein Law GroupFirst linked Jan 2004 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.48× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Diane D. DalmyFirst linked May 2009 · Text search only · 89 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.70× · Went dark 1.91× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur S. MarcusSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jul 2019 | Named in a filing | 75 | 1.11 | 0.73 | 1.39 |
| Tonya Mitchem GrindonBaker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC | Sep 2016 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.54 | 1.24 | 2.03 |
| Donald J. StoeckleinStoecklein Law Group | Jan 2004 | Named in a filing | 50 | 1.55 | 1.48 | 1.00 |
| Diane D. Dalmy | May 2009 | Text search only | 89 | 2.70 | 1.91 | 0.50 |