PARSONS CORP PSN (last ticker on record)
CIK 275880Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,669 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Chapman and CutlerFirst linked Apr 2019 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Apr 2019 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson Dunn & Crutcher | Feb 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,126 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.95 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,669 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Chapman and Cutler | Apr 2019 | Text search only | 95 | 1.17 | 0.32 | 0.89 |
| Foley & Lardner | Apr 2019 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and RiegeFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Cathy A. BirkelandLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
- Peter W. WardleGibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Steven B. StokdykLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Stewart L. McDowellGibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew E. ZuckermanReid and Riege | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 72 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Cathy A. BirkelandLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.58 |
| Peter W. WardleGibson Dunn & Crutcher | Feb 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 1.68 |
| Steven B. StokdykLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 0.95 |
| Stewart L. McDowellGibson Dunn & Crutcher | Feb 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.01 |