DAYTON POWER & LIGHT CO
CIK 27430Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Thelen Reid & PriestFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Taft Stettinius & HollisterFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Thelen Reid & Priest | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 124 | 0.98 | 1.16 | 1.20 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Taft Stettinius & Hollister | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 94 | 1.64 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Richard B. AftanasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Richard B. AftanasSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.90 |