U.S. GOLD CORP. USAU (last ticker on record)
CIK 27093Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2002
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2000 to Jun 2017
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLPFirst linked Oct 2025 · Named in a filing · 223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPFirst linked Oct 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.14×
- Davis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in a filing · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Oct 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Schnader Harrison Segal & LewisFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Meyer Suozzi English & KleinFirst linked Sep 2013 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf, LLPFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP | Oct 2025 | Named in a filing | 223 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 0.97 |
| Troutman Pepper Locke LLP | Oct 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.14 |
| Davis Graham & Stubbs | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 142 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.46 |
| Haynes and Boone | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Ballard Spahr | Mar 2020 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Nov 2018 | Named in a filing | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Oct 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.05 | 0.64 | 1.02 |
| Meyer Suozzi English & Klein | Sep 2013 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Windels Marx Lane & Mittendorf, LLP | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 39 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alexander T. YarbroughSheppard MullinFirst linked Mar 2026 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Nicole A. EdmondsTroutman Pepper Locke LLPFirst linked Oct 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.45×
- Thomas M. RoseTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Oct 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Brian BoonstraDavis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Rick A. WernerHaynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Harvey J. KesnerSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Dec 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Tara Guarneri-FerraraSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Oct 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Richard G. SatinRuskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.First linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert SchwartzLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander T. YarbroughSheppard Mullin | Mar 2026 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Nicole A. EdmondsTroutman Pepper Locke LLP | Oct 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.45 |
| Thomas M. RoseTroutman Sanders LLP | Oct 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.40 | 1.18 | 0.88 |
| Brian BoonstraDavis Graham & Stubbs | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Rick A. WernerHaynes and Boone | Jun 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 64 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Harvey J. KesnerSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Dec 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 67 | 1.02 | 0.90 | 1.50 |
| Tara Guarneri-FerraraSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Oct 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Richard G. SatinRuskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert SchwartzLowenstein Sandler | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 7 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 |