DANA Inc DAN (last ticker on record)
CIK 26780Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Sep 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 1999 to Jan 2008
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- ROSENMAN & COLIN LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 2.29× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Mar 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2001 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| ROSENMAN & COLIN LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 40 | 0.82 | 2.29 | 1.80 |
| Hunton & Williams | Mar 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2001 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David S. HuntingtonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- David C. KarpWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2003 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Herbert J. HuffFirst linked Dec 1998 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Adam O. EmmerichWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- ROBERT L. KOHLKatten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Dec 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.00×
- David E. SobelPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Nov 2015 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David S. HuntingtonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| David C. KarpWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2003 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Herbert J. Huff | Dec 1998 | Named in a filing | 38 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Adam O. EmmerichWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 91 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| ROBERT L. KOHLKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Dec 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 3.00 |
| David E. SobelPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Nov 2015 | Text search only | 20 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 1.19 |