TherapeuticsMD, Inc. TXMD (last ticker on record)
CIK 25743Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Jun 2019 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Akin Gump | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- GARY EPSTEINGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Joshua M. SamekGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Robert S. KantGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.30× · Went dark 2.07× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GARY EPSTEINGreenberg Traurig | Jan 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.87 | 0.63 | 1.32 |
| Joshua M. SamekGreenberg Traurig | Dec 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Robert S. KantGreenberg Traurig | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 22 | 2.30 | 2.07 | 0.87 |