ONEMAIN FINANCE CORP
CIK 25598Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Mar 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2013 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Sidley Austin | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Brown & Wood | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Baker & Daniels | Mar 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gregory A. FernicolaSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Daniel L. BoeglinFaegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Jun 1997 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory A. FernicolaSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2013 | Named in a filing | 67 | 1.07 | 0.40 | 0.85 |
| Daniel L. BoeglinFaegre Baker Daniels | Jun 1997 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.15 |