MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE CO TAP (last ticker on record)
CIK 24545Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked May 2012 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- R. Scott FalkFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Holme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Miller & MartinFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre Baker Daniels | May 2012 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| R. Scott Falk | Nov 2004 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
| McCarthy Tetrault | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.41 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Perkins Coie | Oct 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Holme Roberts & Owen LLP | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 99 | 1.31 | 0.90 | 1.28 |
| Quarles & Brady | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| Miller & Martin | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 49 | 0.33 | 1.26 | 0.74 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jonathan S. SchulmanPerkins CoieFirst linked Feb 2024 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
- Ned A. PrussePerkins CoieFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Jason DayPerkins CoieFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Christian O. NaglerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in a filing · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- W. Dean SalterHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Mar 2003 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Thomas A. RichardsonHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.40×
- R. Scott FalkKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Andrew E. NagelKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2002 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan S. SchulmanPerkins Coie | Feb 2024 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.34 |
| Ned A. PrussePerkins Coie | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Jason DayPerkins Coie | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.53 | 0.98 | 1.00 |
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2005 | Named in a filing | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| W. Dean SalterHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | Mar 2003 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 1.52 |
| Thomas A. RichardsonHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 2.40 |
| R. Scott FalkKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 19 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| Andrew E. NagelKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2002 | Text search only | 19 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 |