CT COMMUNICATIONS INC /NC CTCI (last ticker on record)
CIK 23259Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kutak RockFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Jul 2001 · Named in a filing · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- SMITH HELMS MULLISS & MOORE, L.L.P.First linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kutak Rock | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 123 | 0.93 | 1.56 | 0.64 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Nelson Mullins | Jul 2001 | Named in a filing | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| Mayer Brown | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| SMITH HELMS MULLISS & MOORE, L.L.P. | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.39 | 1.22 | 0.48 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel L. HeardKutak RockFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- R. Douglas HarmonParker Poe Adams & BernsteinFirst linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel L. HeardKutak Rock | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| R. Douglas HarmonParker Poe Adams & Bernstein | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 |