PXP PRODUCING CO LLC PPP (last ticker on record)
CIK 230463Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Feb 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Akin Gump | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Feb 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael E. DillardLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Sean T. WheelerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Stephen A. MassadBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Feb 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael E. DillardLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Sean T. WheelerLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 59 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Stephen A. MassadBaker Botts L.L.P. | Feb 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |