TEXAS NEW MEXICO POWER CO
CIK 22767Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.13 |
| Haynes and Boone | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.86 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 335 | 1.14 | 0.61 | 1.22 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles L. MooreKELEHER & McLEODFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- BRIAN D. BARNARDHaynes and BooneFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles L. MooreKELEHER & McLEOD | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| BRIAN D. BARNARDHaynes and Boone | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.43 | 1.89 | 1.33 |