ROBOTIC VISION SYSTEMS INC RVSI (last ticker on record)
CIK 225868Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Bankruptcy
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2004 to Aug 2005
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Cooperman Levitt Winikoff Lester & Newman, P.C.First linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 3.92×
- PARKER DURYEE ROSOFF & HAFTFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 3.02×
- ROGERS & WELLSFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Cooperman Levitt Winikoff Lester & Newman, P.C. | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.15 | 1.96 | 3.92 |
| PARKER DURYEE ROSOFF & HAFT | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.80 | 1.66 | 3.02 |
| ROGERS & WELLS | May 2002 | Text search only | 69 | 1.05 | 0.34 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joseph H. SchmittSonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Jan 2000 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Harris S. JaffeCooperman Levitt Winikoff Lester & Newman, P.C.First linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 4.34× · 95% wipeout 6.21×
- Ira I. RoxlandSonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked May 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 2.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joseph H. SchmittSonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Jan 2000 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 1.68 |
| Harris S. JaffeCooperman Levitt Winikoff Lester & Newman, P.C. | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.04 | 4.34 | 6.21 |
| Ira I. RoxlandSonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | May 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.19 | 0.96 | 2.82 |