COMMERCIAL METALS Co CMC (last ticker on record)
CIK 22444Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Haynes and Boone | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Faegre & Benson | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Willkie Farr | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael M. PritchardHaynes and BooneFirst linked Dec 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jennifer T. WisinskiHaynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 4.65× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael P. HeinzSidley AustinFirst linked May 2013 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Beth E. FlamingSidley AustinFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.30×
- Thomas A. ColeSidley AustinFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Paul L. ChoiSidley AustinFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- ROBERT R. KIBBYHaynes and BooneFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- William R. Hays IIIHaynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- JOSEPH A. HOFFMANAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael M. PritchardHaynes and Boone | Dec 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.19 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jennifer T. WisinskiHaynes and Boone | Jun 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.99 | 4.65 | 0.00 |
| Michael P. HeinzSidley Austin | May 2013 | Named in a filing | 46 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Beth E. FlamingSidley Austin | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.30 |
| Thomas A. ColeSidley Austin | Dec 2011 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.47 |
| Paul L. ChoiSidley Austin | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 2.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| ROBERT R. KIBBYHaynes and Boone | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| William R. Hays IIIHaynes and Boone | Jun 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| JOSEPH A. HOFFMANAndrews Kurth LLP | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |