GRUBB & ELLIS CO GBE (last ticker on record)
CIK 216039Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Zukerman Gore Brandeis & CrossmanFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Zukerman Gore & Brandeis, LLPFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 2.37× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 169 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Oct 2008 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Jul 2007 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Jenner & BlockFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 122 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zukerman Gore Brandeis & Crossman | Dec 2009 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Zukerman Gore & Brandeis, LLP | Jan 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.10 | 2.37 | 0.85 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jul 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 169 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 1.25 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Oct 2008 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Jul 2007 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
| Jenner & Block | May 2006 | Text search only | 122 | 1.12 | 0.78 | 0.94 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2006 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Clifford A. BrandeisZukerman Gore & Brandeis, LLPFirst linked May 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 2.13× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Scott R. HaberLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Nancy A. LiebermanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clifford A. BrandeisZukerman Gore & Brandeis, LLP | May 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.12 | 2.13 | 0.71 |
| Scott R. HaberLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Nancy A. LiebermanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2006 | Text search only | 14 | 2.52 | 0.00 | 0.69 |