CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC CKP (last ticker on record)
CIK 215419Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Montgomery McCracken Walker & RhoadsFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Stradley Ronon Stevens & YoungFirst linked Jan 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.32 |
| Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young | Jan 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.77 | 0.18 | 0.79 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian D. MillerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
- Thomas L. HanleyStradley Ronon Stevens & YoungFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Joel H. TrotterLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Eric D. SchoenbornStradley Ronon Stevens & YoungFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian D. MillerLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 2.06 |
| Thomas L. HanleyStradley Ronon Stevens & Young | Apr 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.98 | 1.65 | 0.49 |
| Joel H. TrotterLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Eric D. SchoenbornStradley Ronon Stevens & Young | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |