EL PASO CGP CO LLC CGP (last ticker on record)
CIK 21267Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gerald S. TanenbaumCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerald S. TanenbaumCahill Gordon & Reindel | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLP | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 67 | 1.30 | 0.56 | 1.11 |