CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO CE (last ticker on record)
CIK 20947Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Calfee Halter & GriswoldFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 70 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Thelen LLPFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 2.33× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calfee Halter & Griswold | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 70 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Thelen LLP | Sep 2008 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.16 | 2.33 | 1.31 |
| Akin Gump | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wendy E. StarkFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gary D. BenzFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Lucas F. TorresAkin GumpFirst linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Douglas E. DavidsonBerlack, Israels & Liberman LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy E. Stark | Sep 2008 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gary D. Benz | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Lucas F. TorresAkin Gump | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Douglas E. DavidsonBerlack, Israels & Liberman LLP | May 2004 | Text search only | 8 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 |