Vendome Acquisition Corp I VNME (last ticker on record)
CIK 2055879Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Apr 2025 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Apr 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Apr 2025 · Text search only · 964 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Apr 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Maples and Calder | Apr 2025 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Paul Hastings | Apr 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.08 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Apr 2025 | Text search only | 964 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ryan S. BrewerPaul HastingsFirst linked Jun 2025 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Brandon J. BortnerPaul HastingsFirst linked Apr 2025 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Elena NrtinaDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gil SavirPaul HastingsFirst linked Apr 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- Jeffrey C. SelmanDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan S. BrewerPaul Hastings | Jun 2025 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Brandon J. BortnerPaul Hastings | Apr 2025 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.20 | 1.54 | 1.30 |
| Elena NrtinaDLA Piper | Apr 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gil SavirPaul Hastings | Apr 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.65 | 0.00 | 0.42 |
| Jeffrey C. SelmanDLA Piper | Apr 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.05 | 1.34 | 1.25 |