1RT Acquisition Corp. ONCH (last ticker on record)
CIK 2054272Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Feb 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Feb 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Crowell & MoringFirst linked Jun 2025 · Text search only · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 2.10× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2025 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2025 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Feb 2025 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Feb 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Willkie Farr | Feb 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Crowell & Moring | Jun 2025 | Text search only | 59 | 1.69 | 2.10 | 1.49 |
| Morgan Lewis | Jun 2025 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2025 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Maples and Calder | Feb 2025 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew C. MarmerWillkie FarrFirst linked Feb 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Sean M. EwenWillkie FarrFirst linked Feb 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew C. MarmerWillkie Farr | Feb 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Sean M. EwenWillkie Farr | Feb 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 1.01 |