Guardian Metal Resources PLC GMTL (last ticker on record)
CIK 2039972Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Dec 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Dec 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Mar 2026 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Watson Farley & WilliamsFirst linked Mar 2026 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Dec 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Haynes and Boone | Dec 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.86 |
| Norton Rose | Mar 2026 | Text search only | 305 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.22 |
| Watson Farley & Williams | Mar 2026 | Text search only | 93 | 0.59 | 0.32 | 1.32 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Connie MilonakisDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael KaplanDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Steven HollanderWatson Farley & WilliamsFirst linked Mar 2026 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connie MilonakisDavis Polk | Dec 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael KaplanDavis Polk | Dec 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 112 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Steven HollanderWatson Farley & Williams | Mar 2026 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |