REPSOL OIL & GAS CANADA INC.
CIK 201283Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Mar 2012 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Macleod DixonFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2017 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Norton Rose | Mar 2012 | Named in a filing | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Macleod Dixon | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.46 | 0.57 | 1.49 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew J. FoleyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Alan P. BadenVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
- Gillian A. HobsonVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- James M. PrinceVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Christopher J. BarryDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 2.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew J. FoleyPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2017 | Named in a filing | 33 | 0.46 | 0.78 | 0.84 |
| Alan P. BadenVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.88 |
| Gillian A. HobsonVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| James M. PrinceVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| Christopher J. BarryDorsey & Whitney LLP | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 2.10 |