COLORADO INTERSTATE GAS COMPANY, L.L.C.
CIK 200155Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Mar 2009 · Text search only · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.26 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Bracewell LLP | Mar 2009 | Text search only | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 0.96 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Gerald S. TanenbaumCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Charles StillBracewell LLPFirst linked Mar 2009 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Henry HavreAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 67 | 1.30 | 0.56 | 1.04 |
| Gerald S. TanenbaumCahill Gordon & Reindel | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.02 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Charles StillBracewell LLP | Mar 2009 | Text search only | 25 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Henry HavreAndrews Kurth LLP | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 14 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 1.46 |