Cheche Group Inc. CCG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1965473Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Han KunFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Mar 2023 · Text search only · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked Mar 2023 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | May 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Goodwin Procter | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Han Kun | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.85 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.80 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
| Maples and Calder | Mar 2023 | Text search only | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | Mar 2023 | Text search only | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K. Ronnie LiBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Mar 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Dan OuyangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
- Dan EspinozaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K. Ronnie LiBaker & McKenzie | Mar 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Dan OuyangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.29 | 2.60 | 1.78 |
| Dan EspinozaGoodwin Procter | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 0.99 |