AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. ATCH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1963088Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Mar 2024 to Nov 2026
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ruppel & BurnsFirst linked Oct 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in a filing · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Michael Best & FriedrichFirst linked May 2023 · Text search only · 65 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Feb 2023 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruppel & Burns | Oct 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.79 | 0.78 | 1.63 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Feb 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Nelson Mullins | Feb 2023 | Named in a filing | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| Michael Best & Friedrich | May 2023 | Text search only | 65 | 1.51 | 0.48 | 0.61 |
| Winston & Strawn | Feb 2023 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael T. CroninJohnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & BurnsFirst linked Nov 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Tricia BrankerGreenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Alan I. AnnexGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 153 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Jason T. SimonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 120 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Jason D. OsbornWinston & StrawnFirst linked Feb 2023 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael T. CroninJohnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns | Nov 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.23 | 1.59 | 0.97 |
| Tricia BrankerGreenberg Traurig | May 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 3.28 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Alan I. AnnexGreenberg Traurig | Feb 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 153 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 1.15 |
| Jason T. SimonGreenberg Traurig | Feb 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 120 | 0.68 | 0.30 | 1.11 |
| Jason D. OsbornWinston & Strawn | Feb 2023 | Text search only | 9 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 1.42 |