Lotus Technology Inc. LOT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1962746Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Han KunFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Dec 2023 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shin & KimFirst linked Dec 2023 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Mourant Ozannes (Cayman)First linked Mar 2023 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Han Kun | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.87 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Maples and Calder | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Davis Polk | Dec 2023 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Shin & Kim | Dec 2023 | Text search only | 22 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Mourant Ozannes (Cayman) | Mar 2023 | Text search only | 54 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jesse SheleyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.17×
- Steve LinKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Miranda SoDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 2023 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Jonathan B. StoneSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2023 · Text search only · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Benjamin W. JamesKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2023 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Joseph Raymond CaseyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2023 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 5.65× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jesse SheleyKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.58 |
| Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.17 |
| Steve LinKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Miranda SoDavis Polk | Dec 2023 | Text search only | 33 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Jonathan B. StoneSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2023 | Text search only | 60 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Benjamin W. JamesKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2023 | Text search only | 47 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Joseph Raymond CaseyKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2023 | Text search only | 7 | 5.65 | — | 1.19 |