GEMAXEL INC WDDD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1961Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Apr 2013 to Jul 2016
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Law Offices of Irving RothsteinFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Feder Kaszovitz LLPFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 1.21× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Heller, Horowitz & Feit, P.C.First linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law Offices of Irving Rothstein | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.81 | 1.31 | 1.74 |
| Feder Kaszovitz LLP | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.65 | 1.21 | 1.78 |
| Graubard Miller | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
| Heller, Horowitz & Feit, P.C. | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.21 | 2.05 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gabriel KaszovitzFeder Kaszovitz LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 2.66×
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Irving RothsteinHeller, Horowitz & Feit, P.C.First linked Jan 1998 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 2.18× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gabriel KaszovitzFeder Kaszovitz LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 1.56 | 2.66 |
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.33 |
| Irving RothsteinHeller, Horowitz & Feit, P.C. | Jan 1998 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.92 | 2.18 | 1.37 |