Australian Oilseeds Holdings Ltd COOT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1959994Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jan 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Rimon P.C.First linked Jan 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.23× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Dec 2023 · Text search only · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2023 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jan 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Rimon P.C. | Jan 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.00 | 3.23 | 0.54 |
| Pryor Cashman | Dec 2023 | Text search only | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2023 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jan 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 187 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Debbie A. KlisRimon P.C.First linked Jan 2023 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Jessica YuanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jan 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jan 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 187 | 0.98 | 1.25 | 1.32 |
| Debbie A. KlisRimon P.C. | Jan 2023 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Jessica YuanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jan 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 0.00 | 1.16 | 1.18 |