Lavoro Ltd LVROW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1945711Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Campbells LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Davis Polk | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Maples and Calder | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Campbells LLP | Sep 2022 | Text search only | 25 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elliot M. de CarvalhoDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Garth OstermanCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Kristin VanderPasCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Manuel GarciadiazDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Peter ByrneCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Rachel ProffittCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elliot M. de CarvalhoDavis Polk | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Garth OstermanCooley LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.28 | 0.00 | 1.71 |
| Kristin VanderPasCooley LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Manuel GarciadiazDavis Polk | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Peter ByrneCooley LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Rachel ProffittCooley LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.17 |