Vitesse Energy, Inc. VTS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1944558Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker BottsFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Oct 2022 · Text search only · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Oct 2022 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Aug 2022 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2022 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Botts | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 0.98 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.00 |
| Arnold & Porter | Oct 2022 | Text search only | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.81 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Oct 2022 | Text search only | 487 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Morgan Lewis | Aug 2022 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.17 | 0.31 | 1.00 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2022 | Text search only | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brenda LenahanVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Feb 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Shane M. TuckerVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jan 2023 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael J. SwidlerVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Oct 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda LenahanVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Feb 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Shane M. TuckerVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jan 2023 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael J. SwidlerVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Oct 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 |