SK Growth Opportunities Corp SKGR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1912461Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Han KunFirst linked Mar 2025 · Named in a filing · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2024 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Debbie YeeFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Han Kun | Mar 2025 | Named in a filing | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.87 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Maples and Calder | Feb 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2024 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Debbie Yee | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 26 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Debbie P. YeeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Edward J. LeeWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Tamar DonikyanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Robert G. DayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2024 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debbie P. YeeLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Edward J. LeeWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Tamar DonikyanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 1.07 | 0.96 | 1.01 |
| Robert G. DayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2024 | Text search only | 37 | 1.51 | 1.13 | 1.93 |