Kalera Public Ltd Co KAL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1909152Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 2022 to May 2023
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2022 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur Cox | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.91 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Apr 2022 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Maples and Calder | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Connor ManningArthur CoxFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
- David DixterMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Jeffrey W. RubinEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connor ManningArthur Cox | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.57 |
| David DixterMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.57 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |
| Jeffrey W. RubinEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2022 | Text search only | 33 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 1.46 |