D-Wave Quantum Inc. QBTS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1907982Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Aug 2022 to May 2023
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Apr 2024 · Named in a filing · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Feb 2023 · Named in a filing · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Blake Cassels & GraydonFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in a filing · 227 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in a filing · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2022 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Mar 2022 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Mar 2022 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akerman LLP | Apr 2024 | Named in a filing | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Holland & Knight | Feb 2023 | Named in a filing | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Blake Cassels & Graydon | Mar 2022 | Named in a filing | 227 | 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.80 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Mar 2022 | Named in a filing | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| K&L Gates | Jun 2022 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Mar 2022 | Text search only | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Perkins Coie | Mar 2022 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stan RichardsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jan 2026 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christina C. RussoAkerman LLPFirst linked Apr 2024 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Adam M. GivertzPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Christian G. KurtzPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Ian HazlettPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.82×
- Thomas R. MartinGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan RichardsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jan 2026 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.72 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Christina C. RussoAkerman LLP | Apr 2024 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.42 |
| Adam M. GivertzPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Christian G. KurtzPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Ian HazlettPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.82 |
| Thomas R. MartinGreenberg Traurig | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 3.64 | 0.00 | 0.97 |