Aura Fat Projects Acquisition Corp AFAR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1901886Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Mar 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- The Loev Law Firm, PCFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Shook Lin & BokFirst linked Jun 2023 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duane Morris | Mar 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| The Loev Law Firm, PC | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 1.27 | 1.16 | 1.07 |
| Nelson Mullins | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 301 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.88 |
| Shook Lin & Bok | Jun 2023 | Text search only | 27 | 1.38 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Rebekah D. McCorveyDuane MorrisFirst linked Jun 2023 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
- Andrew M. TuckerNelson MullinsFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Carl M. ShererRimon P.C.First linked Jun 2023 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.42× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Andy TuckerNelson MullinsFirst linked Mar 2022 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebekah D. McCorveyDuane Morris | Jun 2023 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.92 |
| Andrew M. TuckerNelson Mullins | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| Carl M. ShererRimon P.C. | Jun 2023 | Text search only | 8 | 1.42 | 1.42 | 1.09 |
| Andy TuckerNelson Mullins | Mar 2022 | Text search only | 26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.94 |