UL Solutions Inc. ULS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1901440Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Seyfarth ShawFirst linked Apr 2024 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2023 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seyfarth Shaw | Apr 2024 | Named in a filing | 102 | 1.57 | 1.38 | 1.25 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2023 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Winston & Strawn | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alexander D. LynchWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Cathy A. BirkelandLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.23×
- Christopher D. LuekingLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander D. LynchWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 115 | 1.18 | 0.33 | 1.45 |
| Cathy A. BirkelandLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.23 |
| Christopher D. LuekingLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 1.61 |