Haleon plc HLN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1900304Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Named in a filing · 258 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2022 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Herbert SmithFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- White & CaseFirst linked Apr 2022 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | May 2022 | Named in a filing | 258 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2022 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Ropes & Gray | May 2022 | Text search only | 914 | 0.97 | 0.14 | 0.91 |
| Baker & McKenzie | May 2022 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Herbert Smith | May 2022 | Text search only | 90 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2022 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2022 | Text search only | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| White & Case | Apr 2022 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John Horsfield-BradburySullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Sebastian R. SperberCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Daniel E. WolfKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2022 · Text search only · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Horsfield-BradburySullivan & Cromwell | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Sebastian R. SperberCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Daniel E. WolfKirkland & Ellis | May 2022 | Text search only | 44 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2022 | Text search only | 110 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2022 | Text search only | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.42 |