Alvotech ALVO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1898416Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2022 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- White & CaseFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Munger Tolles & OlsonFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2022 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| White & Case | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| DLA Piper | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Munger Tolles & Olson | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 80 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Katie KazemCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Christian O. NaglerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Michal BerknerCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Peter S. SeligsonKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katie KazemCooley LLP | Jul 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Michal BerknerCooley LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| Peter S. SeligsonKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 73 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.17 |