Aspen Technology, Inc. AZPN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1897982Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael J. MinahanGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
- Cheryl ChanDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Marc O. WilliamsDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- Phillip R. MillsDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J. MinahanGoodwin Procter | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.61 | 0.91 | 1.76 |
| Cheryl ChanDavis Polk | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Graham RobinsonSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Marc O. WilliamsDavis Polk | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 0.36 |
| Phillip R. MillsDavis Polk | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.52 |