Noble Corp plc NE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1895262Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2024 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Travers SmithFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Watson Farley & WilliamsFirst linked Mar 2022 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Wong Tan & Molly LimFirst linked Mar 2022 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Debbie YeeFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2024 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Davis Polk | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Travers Smith | Dec 2021 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Watson Farley & Williams | Mar 2022 | Text search only | 93 | 0.59 | 0.32 | 1.37 |
| Wong Tan & Molly Lim | Mar 2022 | Text search only | 11 | 2.24 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Debbie Yee | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 26 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Maples and Calder | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kyle T. SeifriedPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Scott A. BarshayPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2024 · Named in a filing · 57 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Clinton W. RancherBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- David L. EmmonsBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 2.42×
- Anne G. PeetzReed SmithFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Connie MilonakisDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Julia DanforthKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.03×
- Julian J. SeiguerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 2024 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Debbie P. YeeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle T. SeifriedPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 2.90 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Scott A. BarshayPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2024 | Named in a filing | 57 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
| Clinton W. RancherBaker Botts L.L.P. | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| David L. EmmonsBaker Botts L.L.P. | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.94 | 1.00 | 2.42 |
| Anne G. PeetzReed Smith | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Connie MilonakisDavis Polk | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | — | 0.00 |
| Julia DanforthKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 3.03 | 0.00 | 3.03 |
| Julian J. SeiguerKirkland & Ellis | Jul 2024 | Text search only | 69 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Debbie P. YeeLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 60 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.33 |