Papaya Growth Opportunity Corp. I PPYA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1894057Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in a filing · 558 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 964 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Dec 2021 | Named in a filing | 558 | 0.98 | 0.61 | 1.10 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 964 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dan EspinozaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Ari EdelmanReed SmithFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in a filing · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Edward BromleyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Marshall P. ShafferWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2021 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dan EspinozaGoodwin Procter | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Ari EdelmanReed Smith | Nov 2021 | Named in a filing | 53 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| Edward BromleyKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2021 | Named in a filing | 6 | 3.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Marshall P. ShafferWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2021 | Text search only | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.76 |