REV Renewables, Inc.
CIK 1891367Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Saul EwingFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 100 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Williams MullenFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Womble Bond Dickinson (US)First linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Paul Hastings | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Perkins Coie | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Saul Ewing | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 100 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 1.14 |
| Williams Mullen | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 113 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Womble Bond Dickinson (US) | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 52 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Ballard Spahr | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| King & Spalding | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Willkie Farr | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jessica LewisVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.70×
- Brenda LenahanVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Adam M. TurteltaubWillkie FarrFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 117 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Benjamin M. RothWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica LewisVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.70 |
| Brenda LenahanVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Adam M. TurteltaubWillkie Farr | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 21 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| ANDREW R. BROWNSTEINWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 117 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Benjamin M. RothWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 54 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.54 |