MNTN, Inc. MNTN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1891027Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2025 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fenwick & West LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Goodwin Procter | Apr 2025 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellen SmileyLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2026 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Brittany D. RuizLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Ian D. SchumanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Ran D. Ben-TzurFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Ryan MittenessFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- James D. EvansFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Dec 2021 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellen SmileyLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2026 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Brittany D. RuizLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Ian D. SchumanLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Ran D. Ben-TzurFenwick & West LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Ryan MittenessFenwick & West LLP | Dec 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| James D. EvansFenwick & West LLP | Dec 2021 | Text search only | 46 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 1.05 |