Snail, Inc. SNAL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1886894Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Sep 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Lucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Sep 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Sep 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.37 |
| Lucosky Brookman LLP | Sep 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 223 | 1.24 | 2.05 | 1.16 |
| Davis Polk | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Leslie MarlowBlank RomeFirst linked Sep 2024 · Named in a filing · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Sep 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.84× · 95% wipeout 1.87×
- Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Sep 2023 · Named in a filing · 188 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.82× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Byron B. RooneyDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- John H. RunneDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2021 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leslie MarlowBlank Rome | Sep 2024 | Named in a filing | 71 | 0.58 | 2.60 | 1.44 |
| Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLP | Sep 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.40 | 1.84 | 1.87 |
| Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLP | Sep 2023 | Named in a filing | 188 | 1.24 | 1.82 | 1.20 |
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Byron B. RooneyDavis Polk | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| John H. RunneDavis Polk | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | — | 1.34 |
| Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2021 | Text search only | 58 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 1.55 |