CENTRAL VERMONT PUBLIC SERVICE CORP CV (last ticker on record)
CIK 18808Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Day Pitney LLPFirst linked May 2008 · Named in a filing · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.First linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Day Pitney LLP | May 2008 | Named in a filing | 69 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P. | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.23 | 1.02 | 0.87 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Nixon Peabody | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William S. LambLeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.First linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert B. WilliamsMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- M. DOUGLAS DUNNMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.10× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William S. LambLeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P. | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert B. WilliamsMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.62 | 1.49 | 0.66 |
| M. DOUGLAS DUNNMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 3.10 | 0.00 |