ESAB Corp ESAB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1877322Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in a filing · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,669 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2022 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 245 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson Dunn & Crutcher | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,126 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.95 |
| Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Apr 2022 | Named in a filing | 97 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,669 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2022 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Allen & Overy | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 245 | 0.99 | 0.36 | 0.63 |
| Arnold & Porter | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.81 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 1.01 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew L. FabensGibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Cathy A. BirkelandLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
- Christopher R. DrewryLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew L. FabensGibson Dunn & Crutcher | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Cathy A. BirkelandLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.58 |
| Christopher R. DrewryLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2022 | Text search only | 14 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 0.00 |